Editorial: Let Epstein files see disinfectant of sunshine

The Editorial Board, Las Vegas Review-Journal on Sep 11, 2025

Published in Op Eds

By clicking submit, I authorize Arcamax and its affiliates to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Privacy Policy , (2) add to information that I provide with other information like interests inferred from web page views, or data lawfully obtained from data brokers, such as past purchase or location data, or publicly available data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email or other means with offers for different types of goods and services, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

Everyone can agree that Jeffrey Epstein was a vile individual. Beyond that is the domain of speculation, conspiracy and bare-knuckle political brawling.

On Monday, the Wall Street Journal reported on details of a 2003 birthday book that Epstein’s then-friends gave him. It contains a letter with a signature that resembles President Donald Trump’s.

The note contains a short script with a voiceover and made-up dialogue between Trump and Epstein. This typed note is contained in the outline of a naked woman. It’s tawdry but far less graphic than what many Democrats want to make available in school libraries.

Trump has vigorously denied penning the letter. He has sued the Journal for $20 billion over its initial July news story reporting on its existence. Trump has been in the public eye for decades. He hasn’t been shy about expressing himself either. The writing style of that letter doesn’t even bear a passing resemblance to Trump’s voluminous output.

One possible explanation is that Trump had a secretary or assistant who penned the note and imitated his signature. It’s logical to assume Trump had people who took care of administrative tasks. This would show that Trump associated with Epstein in 2003, but the public already knew that.

This whole episode is emblematic of the rumors and innuendo circulating around the Epstein saga. The public is well aware that Epstein was a wealthy and well-connected pedophile. What’s less clear is whether Epstein was also a sex trafficker. During his campaign, Trump suggested that he would have no problem releasing Epstein’s supposed client list.

So far, no “list” has been released. The Department of Justice and FBI contend that’s because it doesn’t exist. And now Trump would like the issue to fade away.

“The confused and badly failing Democrat Party did nothing about Jeffrey Epstein while he was alive except befriend him, socialize with him, travel to his Island, and take his money,” he wrote on Truth Social Friday. He continued, “The Department of Justice has done its job, they have given everything requested of them. It’s time to end the Democrat Epstein Hoax.”

He’s right that Democrats’ apparent concern over the Epstein files is politically motivated. It’s understandable for Trump to feel frustrated that this issue is distracting from the many successes of his administration. But his dismissive attitude risks making him appear unsympathetic to Epstein’s many victims.

While there are some legal hurdles in releasing some materials, the Trump administration should release as many files as it can as soon as possible.

_____